<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Syriana</title>
	<link>http://finnegan.hbblogs.com/2008/03/22/syriana/</link>
	<description>observations and pithy reviews from a Harrisonburg cinephile</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 03:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: finnegan</title>
		<link>http://finnegan.hbblogs.com/2008/03/22/syriana/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>finnegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://finnegan.hbblogs.com/2008/03/22/syriana/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.

I say I liked it because I believe the world is infinitely complex, and the movie was complex. I think it's an accurate reflection of the state of things in the Middle East. But I won't disagree with you that a plot just about Clooney's character could have carried an entire film.

It was like three or four movies at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.</p>
<p>I say I liked it because I believe the world is infinitely complex, and the movie was complex. I think it&#8217;s an accurate reflection of the state of things in the Middle East. But I won&#8217;t disagree with you that a plot just about Clooney&#8217;s character could have carried an entire film.</p>
<p>It was like three or four movies at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mason</title>
		<link>http://finnegan.hbblogs.com/2008/03/22/syriana/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://finnegan.hbblogs.com/2008/03/22/syriana/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I'd agree with those critics who said the film was too large. Personally, I don't enjoy a movie when there are too many unrelated subplots. I'm of the belief that every movie plot can be summed with a single sentence. But if that sentence is forced to join together a motley assortment of subclauses all connected by the word "meanwhile", it just loses something for me.

I think Syriana could have been a great movie if it had primarily followed just Clooney's or Damon's character, with all related characters clearly exposited early on and the various subplots pared down to just those handful that were obviously connected to the main story arc (whatever it was). I don't mind a movie that makes me think about the world we live in, but I take exception to a movie that requires ready access to Cliff's Notes just to know what's happening on screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree with those critics who said the film was too large. Personally, I don&#8217;t enjoy a movie when there are too many unrelated subplots. I&#8217;m of the belief that every movie plot can be summed with a single sentence. But if that sentence is forced to join together a motley assortment of subclauses all connected by the word &#8220;meanwhile&#8221;, it just loses something for me.</p>
<p>I think Syriana could have been a great movie if it had primarily followed just Clooney&#8217;s or Damon&#8217;s character, with all related characters clearly exposited early on and the various subplots pared down to just those handful that were obviously connected to the main story arc (whatever it was). I don&#8217;t mind a movie that makes me think about the world we live in, but I take exception to a movie that requires ready access to Cliff&#8217;s Notes just to know what&#8217;s happening on screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <b>/home1/harriso9/public_html/hbblogs/twatch_include/logger.php</b> on line <b>17</b><br />
